網域名稱俱樂部


返回   網域名稱俱樂部 > 其他 > 影音及閑聊測試區
論壇幫助 社區 日曆事件 今日新文章 搜尋

回覆
 
主題工具
  #1  
舊 2006-11-28, 10:25 AM
best-url 的頭像
best-url best-url 目前離線
站務管理
 
註冊日期: 2003-08-11
住址: IDN Club
文章: 9,925
發送 MSN 消息給 best-url
預設 Value of public DN

http://arstechnica.com/news.ars/post/20061127-8292.html


The value of the public domain
11/27/2006 12:54:59 PM, by Nate Anderson


With Beatles songs potentially coming out of copyright soon, the legal team that represents the remnants of the Fab 4 might now be prepared to make their music available online. Both stories raise the question of how much control creators should be granted over their own works, making it the perfect time to revisit some of the broader questions in the debate over the public domain.

The value of "free"
Weather data—it might not be sexy, but it sure is valuable. In the US, much of this data is gathered by the federal government and made available to home users and corporations free of charge. In the UK, though, government weather data is controlled by the Met Office, which charges for access. Which model generates more social and economic benefits? According to an official EU report (PDF), it's the American model. The US government spends only twice as much as the EU on gathering public sector information like weather and mapping data, but generates 10 times the economic value that Europe does by simply giving it away.

Rufus Pollock, who heads the Open Knowledge Foundation, uses this example in a recent essay, "The Value of the Public Domain." His work defends the idea of the public domain as something with tangible social and economic benefits, benefits which need to be taken into account when considering intellectual property reforms.

The essay was written to address what Pollock calls a "form of monomania in which monopoly rights, in the form of intellectual property, displace all else from our thinking on the subject. [The current paradigm] binds us to a narrow, and erroneous, viewpoint in which innovation is central but access is peripheral." But access is important, he argues, because open access can often produce broader social benefits than secrecy. And not just for consumers—businesses can profit, too.

The classic examples are the Internet and the Web, two technologies created by government-funded research programs (DARPA and CERN, respectively). By making technology such as TCP/IP and HTML freely available, these research projects blossomed into the system we've inherited today—a system that has generated billions upon billions of dollars from advertising and direct commerce. In addition, the Web has unleashed a flood of human creativity and now provides access to an astonishing array of knowledge (along with a good deal of misinformation).

Pollock also touches on Google (which relies on indexing "open" content), online file-sharing, and open source software to drive home his main point: "open, 'public domain' approaches can generate commercial as well as societal value." When developing social policy, his paper serves as a reminder that those who argue for a robust public domain need not hate business or want to keep artists from being compensated. The public domain produces its own benefits, which need to be weighed against those offered by patents and copyright; the choice is not a stark one between "producing value" and "producing nothing."

Note: the essay is freely available and only thirteen pages long, making it worth a quick read if you care anything about IP issues.
回覆時引用此篇文章
回覆


發文規則
不可以發表新主題
不可以發表回覆
不可以上傳附件
不可以編輯自己的文章

啟用 BB 代碼
論壇啟用 表情符號
論壇啟用 [IMG] 代碼
論壇禁用 HTML 代碼



所有時間均為 +8。現在的時間是 11:15 PM


本站主機由網易虛擬主機代管
Powered by vBulletin® 版本 3.8.4
版權所有 ©2000 - 2024,Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.